BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Why Cord Cutting Doubled In 2018 And 10 Million Have Left Since 2012

Following
This article is more than 5 years old.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Cord cutting, or the phenomenon of people abandoning their traditional cable and satellite TV subscriptions, has become an industry obsession over the past few years, and understandably so.

Every quarter when the subscriber numbers are released, it becomes more and more clear that cord cutting is a real trend and not just a fluke, as people thought a few years ago.

The latest report suggests it’s getting faster, too. A study by Leichtman Research Group finds that almost twice the number of people left pay-TV providers in 2018 vs. 2017.

Video subscribers declined by 2.9 million last year, Leichtman finds, compared to 1.5 million in 2017. Overall, about 3 percent of pay TV subscribers left last year.

Since 2012, pay TV has lost 10 million subscribers. That’s a significant number for an industry that depends on subscriptions to make money.

The “why” behind the cord cutting is a combination of many factors that reflect signs of the times.

Over-the-top networks such as Hulu, Netflix, Amazon and a slew of competitors offer high-quality television (and even repeat many of the shows you can find on traditional TV, albeit a few months later). These OTTs cost about a tenth of the average monthly cable bill of $107.

TV is no longer time-sensitive; people complain of spoilers years after a show’s series finale aired on broadcast or cable. Viewers are content to catch buzzy programs long after their friends watched them.

A plethora of entertainment choices have also made pay TV less relevant (and this fragmentation is true across other media as well—TV is hardly the only industry suffering). You can play Fortnite or peruse Instagram for hours instead.

Satellite companies have been hit hardest by cord cutting. The Leichtman report found Dish Network and DirecTV combined for a loss of 2.36 million subscribers, almost a million more than the previous year’s decline (1.55 million).

Interestingly, these providers have not been able to offset subscription losses with substantial growth from their so-called “skinny bundles,” cheaper packages that allow consumers to pay less for fewer channels than the traditional cable bundle, which includes more than 100 channels.